Chitchat Breaking chao angmohs continue monopoly in Asia .. Uber

[Sammyboy RSS Feed]

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

Asia is always a big market for chao angmohs British empire descendants. this time $1B Chinese population in China and added 100m 华侨人 in SEA and Central SE Asia.

Angmoh break up the taxi industry and may monopoly the industry with Uber. Time to break them up early. Similar to in 1876 Chinese made a '得罪天上‘ went into producing own opium to suppress chao angmoh opium prices making it worthless to trade in China anymore. This is the history to learn to extent of '得罪天上‘ if you have to.

Set up an open source IT for developers to get into uber business early. 'Open source developers' can make better uber taxi IT apps and give it free. Anyone can drive taxi with less or no commission from the app operator funded by NGO or millions of people crowd funding.

Fuck the Uber company, chao angmoh again, to IPO in $B worth and later become worthless shit IPO.

Talented Sinkies can lead in this if they put their head together push Lee family into it.

This will at least fuck and revenge the chao angmohs who drugged mainly non-white British Subjects 300,000 Chinese population in Singapore for drug trafficking money.


That evening after dinner, I sat on the wide verandah of the hotel, looking over a copy of the "Straits Times." One paragraph, a dispatch from London, caught my eye. " Chinese in Liverpool. Reuter's Telegram. London, January 17, 1917 Thirty-one Chinese were arrested during police raids last night on opium dens in Liverpool. Much opium was seized. The police in one place were attacked by a big retriever and by a number of Chinese, who threw boots and other articles from the house-top."

Coming fresh from a tour of the opium-dens of Singapore, I must say that item caused some mental confusion. It must also be confusing to the Chinese. It must be very perplexing to a Chinese sailor, who arrives in Liverpool on a ship from Singapore, to find such a variation in customs. To come from a part of the British Empire where opium smoking is freely encouraged, to Great Britain itself where such practices are not tolerated. He must ask himself, why it is that the white race is so sedulously protected from such vices, while the subject races are so eagerly encouraged. It may occur to him that the white race is valuable and must be preserved, and that subject races are not worth protecting. This double standard of international justice he must find disturbing. It would seem, at first glance, as if subject races were fair game-if there is money in it. Subject races, dependents, who have no vote, no share in the government and who are powerless to protect themselves-fair game for exploitation.

Is this double-dealing what we mean when we speak of "our responsibility to backward nations, 1) or of "the sacred trust of civilization" or still again when we refer to "the White Man's burden " ?

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/om/om4.htm

---------------------------

New Markets

As China tightened her borders, Britain pinned her hopes on her other Asian colonies. Opium production in the Straits Settlements (Singapore, Penang, Malacca, Labuan) rose from 353,938 pounds in 1916 to 370,688 pounds in 1920, in spite of Britain’s promise at the Hague Convention to limit opium sales. In 1918, 60% of Britain’s Asian income was derived from opium sales. In 1925, opium accounted for 48% of Singapore’s revenue, and 100% of North Borneo’s. At the 1923 Opium Conference, Mr. Campbell admitted that the British Indian government was determined to maintain high levels of both internal consumption and export, and that they,

“controlled the production, distribution, sale, possession – every possible practical question which could arise in connection with opium—in the strictest possible manner—They had built up a complicated and highly efficient administrative system which started from the time the poppy seed was put into the ground, and did not relinquish control of the drug until it was in the hands of the consumers, or till it was actually exported.”

Some wits noted wryly that the Crown did all but light the addicts’ pipes.

When Indians begged Britain to abandon the opium policy, Britain responded that her opium monopoly was a humanitarian service to India (as it had been to China), and that to end the trade would be “a mockery; to many millions it would be sheer inhumanity.”

History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.
Abba Eban, Israeli politician


http://www.amoymagic.com/OpiumWar.htm


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.