An Affair with an older married lady... and the aftermath...

[jwat]

Originally Posted by EnigmaofSorrow

None of them are simple in my opinion.

Maybe Amanda, Felicia and Natasha. Their agenda was clear. Just sex.

Felicia seems no too. Maybe just Natasha.

...

Does this mean Mark will be has more and more with Shirlyn? Upcoming Rebecca (no so soon?) And Mark still need to "payback" a staycation

...

You can charge a referral fee by test drive private session ?

[xvvtsx]

Hey Bro,
Just wanted to say that I've been following this thread with great interest
Thank you for sharing your story
Least the nights are not that lonely

[ouzo18]

Originally Posted by EnigmaofSorrow

Actually, he did not contact me yet. So no to all of the above.

And I think I should be the Concierge of Sex. Haha.

But in the first place, do you have big cock and can lasts longer than 5 minutes? Lol. Just kidding.
I know you will reject him again. But i bet majority of the readers here would really love to see you involved. Then the story will be more juicy. Haha.

[EnigmaofSorrow]

Originally Posted by ouzo18

But in the first place, do you have big cock and can lasts longer than 5 minutes? Lol. Just kidding.
I know you will reject him again. But i bet majority of the readers here would really love to see you involved. Then the story will be more juicy. Haha.

Lol. Big is subjective bro.

To a petite girl like Natasha, I could be huge.

To anyone else, I could be normal.

To an Amazon, I might probably get laughed at.

Lasting more than 5 minutes is subjective too.

Anyway I did not reject him, there is nothing to reject because he did not contact me.

And I am already involved, with my bucket of popcorn. Lol.

[pooren]

this Alan too drama mama. guessed watched too many hollywood movies, if he said can kill him ,maybe. but to say can kill without anyone knowing? he liam neeson?

[EnigmaofSorrow]

Originally Posted by pooren

this Alan too drama mama. guessed watched too many hollywood movies, if he said can kill him ,maybe. but to say can kill without anyone knowing? he liam neeson?

Whether he can or cannot really is not the question. Who knows what a desperate man is capable of?

Mark was deliberate antagonizing him.

We could have seen another sword/razor/knife news story.

[GaryRatface]

Originally Posted by EnigmaofSorrow

Lol. Big is subjective bro.

To a petite girl like Natasha, I could be huge.

To anyone else, I could be normal.

To an Amazon, I might probably get laughed at.

Fully agreed bro

[entering]

Originally Posted by GaryRatface

Fully agreed bro

I'm curious too what's the definition of big.

Cuz my FBs say I'm big but I feel it's my tummy that's big😅😅😅

[sexcision]

Did it ever occurs to you guys that when a woman say you are big, she might also be subtly saying that she is tight? Hahaha.

Anyway, one would know if he is too big for her if he could actually feel her tightness. Else, most likely it's just her trying to boost our moral.

[EnigmaofSorrow]

Originally Posted by entering

I'm curious too what's the definition of big.

Cuz my FBs say I'm big but I feel it's my tummy that's big😅😅😅

Size really does not matter. It is how you use it.

I think there was a survey somewhere that said men with bellies last longer anyway.

[EnigmaofSorrow]

Originally Posted by sexcision

Did it ever occurs to you guys that when a woman say you are big, she might also be subtly saying that she is tight? Hahaha.

Anyway, one would know if he is too big for her if he could actually feel her tightness. Else, most likely it's just her trying to boost our moral.

Very good point made here.

But I think most of us fail to realise the subtlety of such a statement.

We would rather believe we are big than the woman is tight. Our egos are boosted more that way I think.

[bondage]

Double post, apologies.

[bondage]

Originally Posted by sexcision

Did it ever occurs to you guys that when a woman say you are big, she might also be subtly saying that she is tight? Hahaha.

Anyway, one would know if he is too big for her if he could actually feel her tightness. Else, most likely it's just her trying to boost our moral.

As the American saying goes, when the tires hit the road.... then one will know the capabilities of the man and his tools incl his dick versus the responses of the girl (more than just moaning fake or real).

Better still, when she's proactive rather than merely lying down like a dead fish. Anyway it doesn't have to be the act itself.

Foreplay alone with spontaneity and surprises would also be rewarding experience with suitable outcomes. That is also a journey in itself. This is when the girl decides that there is compatibility. If not, she might decide to arouse herself rather than let you arouse her.

Ultimately when she tells you that she has cum a no of times, then you will know (you can question her to verify and judge). Many a time, the regular situation is that of getting the guy to release just because of a transaction.

Validation and morale boosters can come later. Just sharing.

[Neoguri]

Originally Posted by EnigmaofSorrow

Very good point made here.

But I think most of us fail to realise the subtlety of such a statement.

We would rather believe we are big than the woman is tight. Our egos are boosted more that way I think.

That gave me a good idea.
The next time a girl says we are big, we should use reverse psychology and say that it is because she is so tight like a virgin!

[diputs1269]

Originally Posted by Neoguri

That gave me a good idea.
The next time a girl says we are big, we should use reverse psychology and say that it is because she is so tight like a virgin!

This is as good as she is going one big round to praise herself, cheers!