|
FL Dome 2 - The Middle Kingdom Spreads its Wings Freelancers are not subject to the mandatory health checks that are required of registered sex workers that operate in designated red light areas. They operate illegally outside of the system put in place to curb the spread of STDs. Proceed at your own risk. |
|
Thread Tools |
#5506
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
|
#5507
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
|
#5508
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
i know this stable for bad reviews now. But I was lucky in Dec or Jan earlier.. so thot can give another chance by asking around here also. Haha |
#5509
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Upped you +42
|
#5510
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
https://www.impmm3.com/girl.php?id=3635
this is one of the worst gem service shortcut bj with cap less than 2min auto switch to hj massage skill damn super piano look and used hp most of the time super fastfood, lousy service ,no skill,used hp,photo (maybe taken decade ago) she alone can sup so many of my bad comment she also power nornally those ps one atleast some still got service or they dont shortcut u this one bao ga liao JUST DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY |
#5511
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
https://www.impmm3.com/girl.php?id=3367
Tried her a few months ago before CB started. I understand this is a bad bonk thread but my personal experience with her is a positive one which i would like to share w u bros. However, I can only comment from my personal experience, others' might differ so take it with a grain of salt. First of all, i can confirm that is her actual photo but beauty app come slightly into play(you know how it is). Discount 15% from pics. Website states massage but she does Full service if you request for it. She even do ass rimming(my personal fav). Bbbj was great, did not rush at all, blew my first load in her mouth. Her boobs are not the best, pear shaped and slightly saggy but it is acceptable. FJ was great, did missionary, cowgirl and ended with doggy. Pussy quite tight, would be good if she can moan more. Still can lepak awhile after the whole deed, did not rush me to leave. She used to work at a hotel in geylang, but now moved to bukit batok last i heard. Overall experience 8/10 Btw newbie here, this is my very first post hoping to accumulate some points. Please be kind bros. Feel free to leave advice or constructive criticism if any. |
#5512
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
Do ass rimming, french, bbbj, fj , everything also got , i would say she is a gem for that price. Missionary with her is my fav, she will use her legs to wrap around you for better penetration. No using of phone also throughout. |
#5513
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
|
#5514
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
https://www.impmm3.com/girl.php?id=3635
https://$$$$$.info/model/dandan-3087/ walao this two web remove my fr anyway if u see chinese fr 90%is fake anyway this girl is one of the worst gem |
#5515
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
These 2 also her posts https://www.impmm3.com/girl.php?id=3648 https://$$$$$.info/model/yiyi-2001/ She is using fake photos in momo but the admin never care about it . The worst services I ever had , bad altitude and fake photos . Real age around late’s 40 . Don’t waste money and petrol . |
#5516
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
frankly speaking photo ps actually common but atleast service and attuitude dont be so cui....these one really is one of the worst regarding of service and look wondering so many okt in sg none of them supoort the bros side so damn suck dunno which bro got power to make a website and put all the girl in and lets us write realfr about them....if they are repeatly doing shitty service maybe can publish where they live let anti-vice go visit them Last edited by viewer85; 01-07-2020 at 08:00 PM. Reason: update |
#5517
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Nowadays really many bad ones. Back in sg wolf days they were many good stocks around. Really missed them
|
#5518
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
|
#5519
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
These online PRC FLs are seriously getting out of hand. Not only they cheat with fake pictures and poor services, they actually dared to "blacklist" or make false accusations if you reject them One of them told me they have a group chat and database where they will share the numbers of "blacklisted" clients - means other gals will not accept you when you try to book What a joke! My take is simply dun bother to find any single of them. Let them die out on their own if they have zero customers eventually! For me, I simply go GL cat 150 or one of the central spas when I have the needs. U get to see the gal in person first and usually proper service- none of these scams and ridiculous tactics. They are literally taking us for a ride... thinking that they can get away with such scams cos this is SG |
#5520
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Si bei Bad bonk( Only for sponsored gals)
Quote:
__________________
Shake Rattle And Roll!!! Apologies to anyone who have already upped me and I did not return favor, please pm to let me know as I don't usually check rep pts. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
bad, badbonk, fl8090, lousy shit, poor service, prcgongzhuwang, shenhua69 |
|
|
t Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jap gals vs Korean gals, who is nicer to bonk and good on bed? | dreamzknight | Adult Discussions about SEX | 13 | 19-12-2012 11:38 AM |
Nationalities of Gals You Bonk Before | BroRelax | Adult Discussions about SEX | 47 | 19-06-2009 10:16 AM |
Will you still go bonk other gals?? | sunhuan-con | Adult Discussions about SEX | 28 | 13-06-2008 01:36 AM |
Gals I've Bonk | dream-wtf | Health Centre and KTV lounge Tangos | 10 | 18-07-2006 02:27 AM |
How many gals have you bonk?? | actblur | Polls | 17 | 18-01-2005 09:13 AM |