Looks - Frankly quite similar to photo
Location - Not exactly the best for going on foot. Approx 10-12 minutes from MRT?
Massage - Decent but defitinely not piano
Sensual - 5G. FN. Have catbath. BBBJ 8.5/10
Service wise - Can't complain actually. Pretty good.
RTM - Most probably
It always pay to be physically attractive - whether on the ML side or the customer side. It can help hype up the experience in terms of the vibes you get and the responses to sensual actions or interactions. And an attractive guy (with good look, fit body and/or huge dick) very often could get extended mileage.
While it is almost unlikely to get an ideal ML - tall, chio, shapely and leggy ML who could provide solid genuine massage and scintillating repertoire of sensual actions, one realistically finds the MLs who can satisfy you in terms of your most desired wants/needs.
MRs on an ML, no matter how many, will just provide an indication or guide. Upon trying out, one will decide whether she is suitable for subsequent RTM. For me, I quickly rule that An Yi and W as unsuitable for me, for they are not capable of passionate kissing/frenching, an important need for me. (My regular MLs are those whom I regarded as pleasant/pretty, can do good massage and have selectively agreed to fj. Obviously, there can be no discussion about them here)
It is important on our part to be a good customer and treat ML well, whether in terms of conversation, reasonableness of request and service guidance. Don't be KCed. Afterall, we are out to have a good time and most MLs will want to give good service, within their means.
Wise Words
__________________
"I keep my dick safe to chiong for another day and not to end it today. Chiong safely!
Chionging is for life.. not chiong for the moment and regret."
I know it's subjective, but how do you assess first timer status rating for these?
For vanilla MLs probably a all-rounder in terms of massage and sensual? Another factor is the interaction and playability, the latter more like whether the ML makes the effort to flirt with you? Some MLs is like wow during the first session but thereafter no improvement... some is first session rather dull but she makes up if you rtm...
For vanilla MLs probably a all-rounder in terms of massage and sensual? Another factor is the interaction and playability, the latter more like whether the ML makes the effort to flirt with you? Some MLs is like wow during the first session but thereafter no improvement... some is first session rather dull but she makes up if you rtm...
I see. Thanks! Would up you but I can't. Don't even know how things work.
For people to vouch for her...her session is not bad...but because its vanilla...it won't beat those that are FN and having 5G roaming...mls such as RTC OG Angel for one...
Actually it really depends. If the market is good and we are lucky to get good choices for FN 5G MLs who are also quite chio then of course.
But once upon a time, the vanilla ones are the darn chio and hot body ones, while those who offer more pales slightly in comparison in that aspect. That then is a challenge to put one over the other. End of the day different taste for each, some don’t mind a less hot one who gives more sensual some particular about the face and bod. Personally I lean towards the second category (hence the likes of Donna), but when pretty ones like Aini, Angel, Momo (all RTC) offer more they become my go-to regulars.
PSA.
This forum in the news again for the wrong reason due to a group of sicko.
To be fair, this forum will never be in the news for the right reasons.
But it is very polarising. I've been in this thread mostly, and I find the people here are easier to discuss stuff with, maybe due to being less inhibited. Like the toxicity that appears in every public forums is a lot less here in general compared to the other famous sg forums, which is probably due to the average age here being higher.
But then again, I guess the other side of the coins goes waaaaay beyond the other way, with degenerates actually committing heinous crimes...